I have read the Rule 33 (motion for a
new trial) response in its entirety and throughout the document and
the many attachments, I recognized a theme. Of course there are also
a few sub-themes, but it is the prevailing one that I will discuss at
this time. At first glance, it looks good, but wait - reserve
judgment until I add my thoughts, and a few screen-shots.
I would love to publish the response;
however, there is far too much personal information contained within
it, including but not limited to, many addresses, names, connections,
telephone numbers. The Yolanda Jauregui 302s attached are outrageous
and reveal a serious personality disorder, though also enlightening
in a different way. She's worse than even I believed. You can always
open a PACER account and download it yourself.
What is this theme I speak of?
Well, here is one
sub-heading and the opening paragraph:
E.
Bergrin’s Attempt to Suborn Perjury from Yolanda Jauregui and Her
Brother
If Anything Warrants New Charges, Not a New Trial.
Yolanda
Jauregui cooperated with the Government and implicated Bergrin in
drug trafficking and other crimes both in statements to law
enforcement and in testimony at Trial One. Bergrin now claims that
Exhibit 8A to his brief, an unsigned document that purports to
exonerate him of all wrongdoing, contains Jauregui’s truthful
statements. But Bergrin fails to disclose to this Court that he and
his lackeys created Exhibit 8A without any input from Jauregui and
offered her a bribe in an unsuccessful attempt to induce her to sign
it. That scheme is set forth in a series of letters that Anna James
and Brian P. McVan sent to Jauregui. Jauregui subsequently provided
those letters to her counsel, who in turn provided them to the
Government.
Now
after reading that paragraph you may be saying to yourself, who are
these people, so I will explain. Brian McVan is an old Army buddy of
Paul's who is also an attorney and was trying to genuinely help Paul
clear his name. I never spoke to Mr. McVan or his law partner (also
his wife) because I limit contact with anyone involved in this case -
I have been around long enough to know better. I do know that Paul
wanted him to sign-on this case, but I heard the response was that he
was too busy. Now we know why he's busy. This man's intentions were
only good, admirable, and most certainly not nefarious.
As
far as this "Anna James" is concerned, your guess is as
good as mine, but I will give you a few clues. When I first
encountered the person claiming to be Anna James, I believed that
her (or him) and her pals from USP Tucson were scammers busy
soliciting money and attaching themselves (like 5 to 10 of them) to
Paul Bergrin. By the time she left a comment on this blog for me to
contact her in email, I leaned more towards government agent, plant,
saboteur.
If
I were responding to the government's response, I would demand proof
that the scheme claimed and done in his name was ever anything that
Paul was even aware of. This James character tells Paul that Yolanda
wants to tell the truth, to help him, and it all rolls from there.
Anna James also uses the name Annegret Rouse and signs her many
letters differently - a mix of the two names and sometimes including
Esquire and other times Dr. Sometimes her writing is good and other
times you might think she never finished the 6th grade. It's like
different people were playing the part of Anna James. For the record,
I don't believe she actually exists and I'd make the government
produce her.
This
is the comment she left for me on this blog:
What
happened in USP Tucson?
You
may want to read previous posts on this blog to understand how Paul
ended-up in the CMU in Terre Haute, Indiana and silenced, which is
exactly what the government wanted. When the CMU didn't accomplish
the silencing mission, they used the USP Tucson problem to send him
to ADX Florence. Now Paul Bergrin is truly incommunicado.
Paul
wasn't in USP Tucson long before he was sent to SHU. Somehow he
picked-up a group of new friends rather quickly and next thing you
know, he was sent to SHU. I believe that's when some of his documents
and his contact lists were stolen. Before long, various people on his
contacts list were receiving snail mail from an inmate (Rouse) and
also from Annegret Rouse AKA Anna James. A few of his contacts were
really angry - like the producer Dan Gordon - and wanted no further
contact with Paul because of the weird packets soliciting assistance
in Rouse's child rape case and their fake (not registered) charity,
referred to as Turtle Island Project Innocence (TIPI), which they
used all over Facebook to solicit donations via PayPal.
But
go back further than USP Tucson for a moment. Remember when Paul was
in MDC Brooklyn after the 2nd trial? He was designated to USP Coleman
2 and supposed to be on his way in days when suddenly it was changed
to USP Tucson. The only sort of explanation I ever heard was
something about threats to his life. How could inmates in USP Coleman
2 know Paul was coming to threaten his life? They couldn't, and from
that point forward, none of it made sense.
This
is my initial response to the comment:
This
is her response to me:
These
are my responses to her that followed:
And:
And:
The
2nd paragraph under the sub-heading in the response:
Beginning
in about January 2015, James wrote to Jauregui and asked her to help
Bergrin. James told Jauregui that Bergrin and his associates
had negotiated a multimillion dollar book and movie deal with two
prominent Hollywood producers, Daniel Gordon and Lee Daniels, but the
deal was contingent upon them proving that Bergrin was innocent and
the Government had coerced witnesses to falsely implicate him. James
said, “Mr. Bergrin has an agreement with Dan Gordon which gives him
power to direct all the money and decide who will assist with the
production.” SA2267. James not only solicited Jauregui’s
participation, but also said, “Paul Bergrin says that he still
loves Ramon [Jauregui’s brother Ramon
Jimenez, who also cooperated and testified against Bergrin at Trial
One] and wants him to make money on the movie.” Id.
You
see how it says Anna James says that Paul Bergrin says blah blah
blah? So the scammers made-up statements from Paul OR it was the
government to begin with, and I will go with the latter. Let's say
that the government had a known informant in USP Tucson ready and
willing to help sabotage anything and everything Paul did in his
continuous defense in this case. It's more than a mere possibility.
Oh and for the record, these packets and letters were also sent to
William Baskerville, Rakeem Baskerville, and Hakeem Curry. Two of the
three asked me what it was about and I simply said that I thought
they were scammers and to watch out! As far as I am aware, none
responded to James/Rouse.
The
3rd paragraph under the sub-heading in the response:
James
said that a certificate (referring to what Bergrin later submitted as
Exhibit 8A) “will be required from you
prior to signing of contracts [that would entitle Jauregui and Ramon
to collect proceeds from book and movie deal].” SA2269. James
described the nature of the statements Jauregui and Ramon would have
to claim were true in order to collect money from Bergrin: “the
investors have read everybodies [sic] testimony including R’s
[Ramon’s] and yours and are working on contracts and statements for
you and him.
This is paramount to the story to prove the cohersion [sic] and to
prove the innocence of those parties
involved. I cannot be clearer since I cannot be sure if this letter
is handed to you
as special mail [attorney/client privileged] or not.” SA2268.
Similarly, James wrote, “Dan Gordon the producer really wants to
interview Ramon, because he has a copy of his testimony and it is his
opinion that the prosecutors suggested his testimony about drugs and
the Kenner [Kemo] murder case. This is very important to the writers
to support their position.” SA2267.
Do
you see how it's more of the same James says that Paul Bergrin says
blah blah blah? It is easy to believe that McVan had no clue what
Anna James stated to various people and attributed to Paul Bergrin.
How could he possibly know everything this saboteur was saying
everywhere? He couldn't, yet the government has actually called him a
part of the scheme; a scheme which I believe they made-up all by
themselves.
I
say that Anna James et al, is a figment of the government's
imagination with the help of at least one inmate from USP Tucson. I
could be wrong and they could just be a bunch of Native American
scammers - the inmate Rouse and the rest that befriended Paul in USP
Tucson are Native Americans. I'd demand that the government produce
this person. They shouldn't be allowed to use he said /she said
hearsay to make-up for their inability to actually respond to Paul's
motion for a new trial - that is what they did throughout the trial!
The writer of this response is a skilled manipulator.
So,
you see how "Anna James" (the government in my opinion)
tried to drag me into this fiasco? Well, they forgot who I am and
what I suffered through with my own case long ago, but I will never
forget. There's much more and I will get to it all eventually. For
now suffice it to say that "Anna James" is not the first
saboteur the government threw into this case.
